Skip to content

Banks Prohibited from Introducing Fresh Credit Card Commission Fees by Supreme Court

Credit card issuance fees changes are unlawful if instigated by banks independently, according to the ruling of the civil cases judicial panel at the Supreme Court.

Banks Prohibited from Introducing Fresh Credit Card Commission Fees by Supreme Court

Take a Peek at the Latest Russian Banking Drama

Welcome folks! Today, we're diving into the wild, wild world of banking in Russia. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (SC RF) is tossing a curveball that could shake up the banking sector—as it should!

The recent ruling declared that a bank cannot unilaterally slide new or increased commission fees under existing consumer credit agreements, regardless of any vague terms in the contract[1]. Thisbold move was triggered by a complaint from a St. Petersburg resident, who was given a credit card by Alfa Bank with a sweet perk—no fees on withdrawals up to 50,000 rubles per month. But just a month later, Alfa Bank greedily imposed a commission of 5.9% of the withdrawn sum plus an additional 900 rubles[2].

Ironically, Alfa Bank believed they had the right to suddenly hike tariffs according to the contract—no dice, Banksy! Courts of three instances agreed with the bank, but the mighty SC RF saw through this technicality and declared the commission null and void, sending the case back for a re-hearing.

And the drama doesn't stop there! In late April, the SC RF also nullified a fraudulent credit agreement obtained by hacking a client's Alfa Bank mobile app account. The scammers cleverly transferred the victim's phone number to their own and disabled remote access notifications, using the victim's electronic signature to steal a 265,500-ruble loan[3]. A criminal case is underway, but the suspect remains at large.

In yet another twist, Russian courts initially refused to address deception and chalked it up to negligence on the client's part[3]. However, the wise SC RF saw through the violation of legal norms and overturned the past decisions.

So, keep your eyes on Alfa Bank and other banks in Russia. Remember, they can't unilaterally change contract terms or swing new commission fees at you—not anymore! Stay savvy, and keep those banks in check.

For more hot takes on this and other juicy news, don't forget to follow our Telegram channel (@expert_mag)! #Supreme Court #Credit #Credit Cards #Russia

Insight: While Russian law does not explicitly ban banks from tweaking contract terms and imposing new fees, banks must adhere to contractual provisions and legal requirements to make changes. Consumer protection laws are in place to defend against unfair practices[1].

[1] Enrichment Data: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=banking+laws+in+russia+unilaterally+changing+fees&btnG=

[2] Enrichment Data: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4668916

[3] Enrichment Data: https://www.tass.ru/ekonomica/13300486

  1. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has made a ruling that banks, like Alfa Bank, cannot unilaterally change existing contract terms or impose new commission fees under consumer credit agreements.
  2. In 2022, the SC RF also nullified a fraudulent credit agreement obtained by hacking a client's Alfa Bank mobile app account, a case that was initially dismissed as negligence but was later overturned due to legal violations.
  3. Despite some Russian courts initially refusing to address deception, the Supreme Court has been instrumental in overturning past decisions and upholding consumer protection laws in the banking sector.
  4. With the Supreme Court's recent rulings, it's crucial for businesses and individuals to stay informed about banking practices in Russia to ensure fair treatment and protect themselves from potentially fraudulent activity.
Credit card issuers lack the authority to unilaterally instate new charges on pre-existing credit cards, as ruled by the Judicial College of Civil Cases in Ver...

Read also:

    Latest