Skip to content

Cinema under scrutiny by customs authorities

U.S. President Donald Trump proposes enforcing a complete tariff on foreign-made films, primarily targeting Hollywood productions filmed overseas to reduce costs. This tariff, according to Trump, aims to revive the supposedly ailing American film industry, a view not universally accepted by...

Cinema under scrutiny by customs authorities

In a surprising twist, former U.S. President Donald Trump just threw the film industry into a heated debate with his latest announcement. On May 4, 20XX, Trump proposed a radical move, instructing the Department of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative to initiate a process for imposing a staggering 100% tariff on all films produced outside the U.S.

Dubbing the U.S. film industry as "dying," Trump argued that other countries lure American filmmakers and studios away from the United States with various incentives and funding, threatening national security and messaging. In a fiery statement on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump declared, "We want movies made in America again!"

However, industry representatives aren't as convinced as Trump. As film production increasingly moves overseas, destinations like Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and other Eastern European countries are reaping the benefits, with iconic locations and financial incentives. Hollywood projects, such as "Mission: Impossible - Fallout," "Ballerina," the spin-off of the "John Wick" franchise, and "Avatar: The Way of Water," were all shot abroad in recent years.

After Trump's announcement, the global film market could be directly impacted. Potential blockbusters like Christopher Nolan's "Odyssey" and upcoming Avengers, Spider-Man, and Star Wars productions are slated to be shot in the UK, increasing the risks and costs in the industry. With the pandemic, strikes, wildfires, and other challenges already looming, a potential tariff could be the last straw that breaks the camel's back.

However, it's still unclear if this measure will come to fruition. As of the knowledge cutoff in December 2023, no records of a formal proposal have been made public. Moreover, Trump's statement makes no mention of foreign films produced by studios and distributed in the U.S.

If the 100% tariff were to be implemented, the consequences could range from increased production costs, distribution and exhibition risks, and cultural impacts, to potential retaliation from affected countries. The film industry, a significant contributor to the global economy, could face instability and decline under such circumstances.

Yulia Shagelman

  1. Donald Trump proposes a 100% tariff purely on films produced outside the U.S., aiming to revitalize the domestic film industry, as evidenced by his statement on Truth Social.
  2. The entertainment industry, businesses, and even general-news outlets are entangled in a heated debate following Trump's proposal, with many questioning its feasibility and potential consequences.
  3. Studios in countries such as Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and other Eastern European nations may experience a significant blow in their film industries if the tariff is implemented due to the loss of Hollywood productions.
  4. If successful, the tariff could lead to increased production costs, distribution and exhibition risks, and cultural impacts for the global film market, potentially triggering retaliation from affected countries.
  5. Trump's announcement has raised concerns about the stability and decline of the film industry as a significant contributor to the global economy, given the potential destabilizing effect of the proposed 100% tariff on films produced outside the U.S.
U.S. President Donald Trump unveils proposed 100% tariff on foreign-produced films; this seemingly targets Hollywood productions filmed overseas for cost-cutting purposes. Trump advocates this move as a lifeline for the supposedly ailing American film industry, a stance opposition from industry figures contradicts. Commentary by Julia Shagelman follows.

Read also:

    Latest