Skip to content

Contention regarding proposed contract for Thyssenkrupp CEO's renewal

Controversy Regarding New CEO Contract Proposal at Thyssenkrupp

Contention Regarding Proposed Contract Renewal for Thyssenkrupp CEO
Contention Regarding Proposed Contract Renewal for Thyssenkrupp CEO

Steel Shake-up: Thyssenkrupp CEO's Contract in Question Amid Strategic Overhaul

Controversy Regarding Fresh Contract Agreement for Thyssenkrupp's CEO - Contention regarding proposed contract for Thyssenkrupp CEO's renewal

The soap opera continues at Thyssenkrupp as Jürgen Kerner, deputy chairman of their supervisory board and a heavyweight in the IG Metall union, has raised eyebrows. In a recent opinion piece, he voiced his displeasure against the prospect of extending CEO Miguel López's contract, questioning the lack of a solid plan for the company's most critical division - the steel sector. The board is set to convene this Friday.

Rumors are swirling that the board plans to extend López's contract, which currently expires in May 2026, barely three years into his tenure. Another item on the agenda? The proposed spin-off of the marine division.

Now, about the steel giant of Germany... It's about to slim down. Some 5,000 of the 26,000 jobs are on the chopping block, and another 6,000 could be spun off, aiming for independence. The Czech energy company EPH of businessman Daniel Kretinsky already owns a sizable 20% stake. The goal? A 50:50 joint venture.

Kerner's main gripe? The unclear commitment from the incoming investors. The mystery billionaire investor's intentions regarding the steel division's future funding leave considerable uncertainty. Kerner suggests, "Before spinning off, independence, or even capital market capabilities for the steel division can happen, the future financing must be ironed out."

In the backdrop of a massive subsidy by the federal and state governments for green steel production, Kerner has dismissed the idea of government participation in the steel division. Instead, he floats a foundation solution. The idea is to examine whether the securing of steel supply could be considered a matter of public welfare. Kerner suggests this approach could potentially provide a route to secure steel production without revenue-driven expectations, by way of a foundation.

In essence, Thyssenkrupp is gearing up for a dramatic makeover, spreading its business segments to independent entities to boost transparency, innovation, and corporate appeal. Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe is inching towards a strategic union with EPG, anticipating mutual benefits and capital infusion to weather the pressures of the ever-competitive steel industry. The union, however, faces internal opposition and worries due to the division's checkered past and the need for a strong funding blueprint for its continuous survival [1][2].

  1. In light of the proposed spin-off of Thyssenkrupp's steel and marine divisions, the employment policy and community policy within these sectors might need to be reevaluated to align with the new business structures, considering the potential job losses and future independent status.
  2. As Thyssenkrupp navigates the ever-competitive steel industry, the company's employment policy should also address the financing aspect, ensuring a clear commitment from incoming investors for the steel division's future, as suggested by Jürgen Kerner, to eliminate any uncertainties and secure the division's long-term success.

Read also:

    Latest