Skip to content

Decline in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Implementation

December 30th marked the commencement of the EU's MiCA regulation for digital assets, concurrently experienced a decline in USDT's market capitalization, surpassing $141 billion.

Decline in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Enforcement
Decline in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Enforcement

Decline in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Implementation

EU's MiCA Regulation Reshapes Stablecoin Landscape

The European Union's (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation is set to significantly impact the stablecoin market, particularly for major players like Tether.

Under MiCA, stablecoin issuers are required to hold a certain percentage of their reserves in low-risk EU commercial banks. Tether, one of the industry's leading players, faces a threshold of 60% or more, while smaller issuers must hold 30%.

This new regulation imposes licensing, reserve, and liquidity norms on stablecoin issuers, transforming the EU crypto landscape with far-reaching effects. The strict requirements include full backing by high-quality liquid reserves held in Europe, transparency through periodic audits, licensing as electronic money institutions (EMIs), and direct supervision by European financial authorities.

These requirements raise the operational and compliance burden for issuers, especially those currently operating with less oversight or infrastructure aligned with EU standards. As a result, Tether's USDT has faced delisting from EU exchanges due to non-compliance, reducing its market share in favor of MiCA-compliant stablecoins.

MiCA’s framework also favors larger firms capable of meeting these regulatory and operational demands. This may disadvantage smaller or less capitalized issuers, thus driving market consolidation as only well-equipped players can afford compliance costs and regulatory complexity.

However, MiCA leaves a regulatory gap for stablecoins issued outside the EU, potentially exposing the EU to systemic risks as non-EU stablecoins remain unregulated under MiCA’s regime. This loophole could undermine the intended market consolidation inside the EU and pose challenges for stablecoin issuers navigating cross-border legal landscapes.

The implications for Tether specifically include increased regulatory compliance costs, potential loss of market share due to delisting, and the need for a strong internal compliance and local presence to operate within the EU.

Despite these challenges, Tether's substantial cash reserves and diversified revenue streams may help mitigate the economic burden of MiCA compliance. Moreover, most EU countries provide transitional periods of 6 to 18 months for compliance with the new MiCA rules.

Uldis Teraudkalns, Chief Revenue Officer at Paybis, predicted that MiCA will drive industry consolidation and reduce competition in the EU market. Agnė Lingė of WeFi stated that compliance with MiCA could be economically burdensome for large stablecoin issuers like Tether.

Teraudkalns speculated that compliance costs could push out some companies, regardless of size. He also suggested that jurisdictions like the UK and Switzerland may benefit from MiCA due to their regulatory developments. In December, Tether's CEO Paolo Ardoino echoed the sentiment that MiCA could be seen as a "gift" to traditional financial institutions.

The EU's MiCA regulation for digital assets became effective on December 30. As the regulation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the stablecoin market will adapt and evolve within the EU.

The European Union's MiCA regulation has set licensing, reserve, and liquidity norms for stablecoin issuers in the finance and technology sector, reshaping the EU's crypto business landscape with far-reaching effects. This regulation may drive consolidation in the crypto exchanges industry as it places a higher operational and compliance burden on issuers, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less capitalized players.

Read also:

    Latest