Skip to content

Germany reduces financial assistance for development to enhance military expenditure

Increased military expenditure in Germany, coupled with reduced funding for international aid, raises concerns among humanitarian organizations. The potential impact on millions of individuals in conflict-stricken regions worldwide is a matter of growing alarm.

Germany reduces financial support for foreign development projects to enhance military spending.
Germany reduces financial support for foreign development projects to enhance military spending.

Germany reduces financial assistance for development to enhance military expenditure

In a significant move that has far-reaching implications for global humanitarian aid and international relations, both Germany and the United States are reducing development aid while increasing military spending.

Germany, traditionally a nation that spends around 1-2% of its GDP on military expenditure, is planning to increase this figure to 3.5% by 2029, mirroring the United States' current military spending percentage. This change is driven by geopolitical concerns, including increased tensions in Europe and a perceived need for greater European autonomy in defence.

However, German NGOs and international organizations are emphasizing the importance of maintaining foreign aid budgets. They warn that cuts in development aid risk undermining global trust and progress towards equity, especially as other donors also cut aid. Germany remains one of the top donors worldwide, but the pivot to military spending introduces tension between defence priorities and the commitment to humanitarian aid.

Meanwhile, the United States continues to lead global military spending by a large margin, with expenditures just under $1 trillion in 2024, accounting for about 40% of world total military spending. In contrast, the U.S. has significantly reduced its development aid contributions, disrupting global development programs.

The reduction in development aid from both countries creates a vacuum in global development finance, which is difficult to fill by other donors. This shift in priorities from aid to defence challenges the traditional balance wherein major powers used development assistance as a tool for global stability and influence.

For humanitarian aid, reduced funding means fewer resources for health, education, and poverty alleviation, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries. On the international stage, increased military spending signals a return to power politics and strategic competition, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering cooperation.

Germany’s military buildup may strain transatlantic relations and complicate its role as a leader in global development and humanitarian efforts. The U.S. retrenchment from development aid undermines its soft power and leadership in global health and humanitarian systems, potentially ceding influence to other powers.

In essence, the dual trend of cutting development aid and increasing military budgets in the U.S. and Germany risks weakening global humanitarian efforts and reshaping international relations towards more militarized and competitive dynamics, with challenges for global stability and cooperation.

Notably, Germany's draft federal budget for 2025 includes cuts to the Economic Cooperation and Development Ministry, with a reduction of €1 billion compared to 2024. Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan, a Social Democrat, states that Germany remains committed to its global responsibilities despite budgetary constraints.

In the United States, President Donald Trump, in his second term, has reportedly slashed about 80% of development aid. Michael Herbst, chair of VENRO, stated that more than 100 million people are displaced globally and that many donor countries, including Germany, are reducing their aid. The UN-administered relief fund has been completely withdrawn from by the United States.

These cuts and increases in military spending are occurring across various countries, raising concerns about the future of global humanitarian aid and international relations. Germany can and must take responsibility in providing aid, as its economy benefits from strong international ties and global stability.

For those interested in staying updated on German politics and society, every Tuesday, the website editors round up what is happening, and you can sign up for a weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

  1. The shift in German foreign aid policy from development aid to increased military spending, mirroring the United States, raises concerns about global humanitarian efforts and international relations.
  2. The reduction in both Germany and the United States' development aid, combined with increased military spending, poses a challenge for global stability and cooperation.
  3. In Europe, Germany's planned increase in military spending and cuts to development aid could strain transatlantic relations and complicate its role as a leader in global development and humanitarian efforts.
  4. With the reduction in foreign aid from major powers like the U.S. and Germany, other donors face difficulty in filling the void in global development finance.
  5. The decrease in development aid disproportionately affects vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries, reducing resources for health, education, and poverty alleviation.
  6. The increase in military spending globally, led by the United States, signals a return to power politics and strategic competition, potentially escalating tensions instead of fostering cooperation.
  7. Significant cuts in development aid from the United States under President Trump's second term, along with increased military spending across various countries, have prompted concerns about the future of global humanitarian aid and international relations.

Read also:

    Latest