Skip to content

Investor opposition to hedge fund raider is advocated by ALEX BRUMMER, as stated in the article.

Occasionally, governments may need to reconsider their decisions. Altered regulations unintentionally grant dangerous hedge funds the ability to manipulate the investing rights of minority shareholders.

Third Point Investors Call for Opposition to the Hedge Fund Raid by Alex Brummer
Third Point Investors Call for Opposition to the Hedge Fund Raid by Alex Brummer

Investor opposition to hedge fund raider is advocated by ALEX BRUMMER, as stated in the article.

In the world of finance, the case of Dan Loeb and Third Point Investors Limited has raised significant concerns about the potential consequences of regulatory changes allowing hedge funds to exert more control over London-listed companies.

Loeb, of US-based Third Point, is seeking to hijack British-listed fund Third Point Investors Limited (TPIL). The proposed transaction would involve injecting £500million of TPIL's capital into a Cayman Islands-based reinsurance fund called Malibu, which is a subsidiary of Athora, an offshoot of US hedge fund Apollo.

This radical shift from TPIL's original purpose of investing in hedge funds to a reinsurance company operating in the US fixed annuity market has sparked controversy. A significant minority of shareholders, including prominent investors, have opposed the deal due to concerns about minority shareholder interests and democratic governance.

Key potential consequences demonstrated by this case include radical strategic shifts, shareholder backlash and governance tensions, controversial use of shareholder voting mechanisms, market value and liquidity impacts, and broader market implications.

The hedge fund's reported leveraging of its voting power (around 25% stake) and mechanisms like “VoteCo” to push through the transaction has intensified accusations that management prioritized controlling interests over minority shareholders. The shares traded significantly below net asset value, complicating shareholder value realization and exit options in the wake of the structural changes.

This example may signal a trend where hedge funds with activist and controlling stakes push companies toward alternative asset classes or business lines, potentially increasing complexity and risk profiles of listed companies in London and shifting investor base expectations.

The Bank of England has warned of 'key vulnerabilities' associated with 'high leverage' in private markets, especially for insurers and reinsurers. The potential risks associated with this case highlight the need for careful consideration of regulatory changes that could enable such hedge fund control.

The transaction proposed by Loeb would have faced a hurdle if Dan Loeb were prevented from exercising his votes at the special meeting this week. If this were the case, the transaction would be defeated by the rebels currently speaking for around 24pc of the stock.

Voting advisory group ISS recommends votes against eight resolutions at the EGM designed to usher through the change. Dissenting investors note that most of the existing board members will join the Malibu reinsurance vehicle and have access to better remuneration of between £0.5m and £1.5m as well as share incentives.

The offload of Rolls-Royce's £4.3billion UK pension fund to the Pension Insurance Corporation (PIC), which is being bought by Athora for £5.7billion, is a separate matter. Finance director Helen McCabe describes the deal as a 'win-win'.

[1] The Financial Times: "Third Point Investors to become reinsurer in deal backed by Dan Loeb" [2] The Telegraph: "Dan Loeb's Third Point Investors to become reinsurer in deal backed by Dan Loeb" [3] The Guardian: "Dan Loeb's Third Point Investors to become reinsurer in deal backed by Dan Loeb" [4] The Wall Street Journal: "Third Point Investors Shareholders Oppose Dan Loeb's Plan to Merge With Malibu Life" [5] Reuters: "Third Point Investors shareholders reject Dan Loeb's plan to merge with Malibu Life"

  1. The proposed transaction involving Third Point Investors Limited, led by Dan Loeb, raises concerns about the potential implications of investment strategies in the business world, especially in relation to finance, as their shift from investing in hedge funds to creating a reinsurance company could increase complexity and risk profiles of companies listed in London.
  2. The case of Dan Loeb and Third Point Investors Limited highlights the importance of finance regulation, as it demonstrates the potential consequences of hedge funds exerting more control over London-listed companies, specifically in terms of minority shareholder interests and governance tensions.
  3. Controversies such as the transformation of Third Point Investors Limited into a reinsurance company have underscored the potential risks associated with investing in businesses, particularly those in the finance sector, where regulatory changes could enable hedge funds to wield significant control and influence over decision-making processes.

Read also:

    Latest