Skip to content

Trump urges Apple to manufacturers goods domestically in U.S.

Experts issue alerts on potential financial burdens

Trade dispute started by U.S. President Trump results in Apple losing its designation as the...
Trade dispute started by U.S. President Trump results in Apple losing its designation as the globe's most prized stock market asset.

Trump Takes Aim at Apple, U.S. Production Proposal Faces Costly Backlash

Trump urges Apple to manufacturers goods domestically in U.S.

Want to hear a hot take? For years, most of your cherished iPhones were churned out in China. But now, Apple's got some big moves going on. They're amping up production in India due to some friction with Beijing, but it seems that's still not enough for President Trump. He's been pressuring Apple, demanding they shift their manufacturing base to the good 'ole U.S.A.

During a recent meet-up in Doha, Trump made his stance abundantly clear. He doesn't care about the fact that Apple's ramping up production in India, not China - no, he wants it made in the land of the free.

For a long time, Apple was all about farming out their device manufacturing to contractors in China. But with the on-going tensions between Beijing and Washington, Apple's been setting up production facilities in India. Remember, way back in May, Apple's CEO, the ever-popular Tim Cook, said he expects most iPhones sold in the U.S. to be imported from India this quarter.

"We've been wise to spread our eggs in multiple baskets," is what ol' Tim had to say about it. "With the tensions rising, we've been on the hunt for new sources for parts, and we'll keep it up," he added, not mincing his words. Back in February, right after Trump's inauguration, Apple also promised investments within the U.S. of over half a trillion dollars and vowed to create 20,000 jobs.

Now, when asked about the cost difference compared to China, Trump's trade minister, Howard Lutnick, essentially said, "Robots will take care of it." In the U.S., this move would supposedly generate "millions and millions" of jobs for constructors and mechanics maintaining those robots. Recently, Lutnick was all praise, exclaiming, "The days of millions and millions of humans assembling iPhones are numbered - they're coming to America!"

But hold your horses, because those excited ideas? They're not quite as simple or feasible as they seem. Economy specialists, who know Apple's supply chains like the backs of their hands, have a different story. Dan Ives, an analyst at investment firm Wedbush, laughs off such notions. He warns that if iPhone manufacturing moved to a factory in West Virginia or New Jersey, the price tag on a device would balloon to a whopping $3,500! If Apple were to transfer just 10% of their supply chain to the U.S., it would take a whopping three years and a cool $30 billion, Ives estimated on a CNN news channel.

Sources: ntv.de, jki/dpa

Movers and shakers: Donald Trump, Apple, India, China

Context:

Moving Apple's production from China to the U.S. would potentially bring forth several significant costs and implications, including:

  • Increased Labor Costs: Manufacturing in the U.S. would lead to a hefty increase in labor expenses compared to China or India, due to higher labor costs.
  • Higher Production Costs: iPhones manufactured in the U.S. could cost as much as $3,000, according to industry experts, because of the increased labor and potentially more expensive facilities.
  • Investment in Infrastructure: Moving production to the U.S. would necessitate substantial investment in new facilities and infrastructure, increasing the overall costs.
  • Supply Chain Diversification: Shifting production to the U.S. could help reduce dependency on China, but it would also mean diversifying away from other countries like India and Vietnam.
  • Market Impact: The increased iPhone prices could dampen consumer demand and potentially lead to reduced sales volumes, impacting Apple's market share and revenue.
  • Technological and Economic Implications: Keeping manufacturing in the U.S. might hinder technological transfer to other countries, but could also strain relations with countries like China and India.
  • Political and Trade Relations: Deciding to move production to the U.S. could be influenced by political pressures, such as those from the U.S. administration, impacting international trade relations.

Community policy should address the potential implications of relocating Apple's production from low-cost regions like China and India to the United States, including increased costs for labor and infrastructure. The employment policy must consider the technological advancements required to maintain the production efficiency, such as the use of robots, to make the shift feasible.

The finance and business sectors are closely watching this trade dispute between the United States and China, as a shift in Apple's production could impact the global balance of industries. The industry experts warn that such a move could lead to significant increases in the cost of iPhones due to higher labor and facility expenses.

Read also:

    Latest